Research article

Sustainability disclosure in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Received: 29 June 2024 Revised: 01 October 2024 Accepted: 14 January 2025 Published: 21 January 2025
  • JEL Codes: Q56, Q01, O20

  • This study examined the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of 117 companies across Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Qatar from 2021 to 2022 (totaling 234 observations) from the institutional theory perspective using a mixed methods approach. The research is structured in two stages: First, we analyzed ESG scores from ESG Refinitiv data to measure ESG performance based on 186 comparable metrics across 10 categories; second, we conducted a directed content analysis of sustainability reports that utilized 27 ESG disclosure indicators from the GCC Exchanges Committee's unified guidance. Integrating quantitative ESG scores with qualitative content analysis enables a deeper understanding of how companies in these Gulf countries respond to institutional pressures within their unique socio-political contexts. Our findings revealed that while ESG performance has generally improved across the three countries, the extent and nature of these improvements vary significantly. The UAE demonstrates the most substantial progress, particularly in environmental performance, driven by robust institutional frameworks and alignment with global sustainability standards. Saudi Arabia shows moderate improvements, reflecting the influence of Vision 2030 and ongoing reforms. In contrast, Qatar lags, especially in governance and social performance, due to weaker regulatory frameworks and slower internalization of sustainability norms. We found that the effectiveness of ESG improvements are closely tied to the strength of institutional frameworks, the intensity of external pressures, and the degree of internalization of sustainability norms in each country. It underscores the role of coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures in driving corporate disclosure practices. It highlights the complexities of sustainability reporting across sectors and national contexts in the GCC region. The research contributes to understanding how institutional pressures shape corporate sustainability practices in the Gulf region, offering valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars interested in the dynamics of ESG and sustainability in emerging markets.

    Citation: Amr ElAlfy, Adel Elgharbawy, Tia Rebecca Driver, Abdul-Jalil Ibrahim. Sustainability disclosure in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: Opportunities and Challenges[J]. Green Finance, 2025, 7(1): 40-82. doi: 10.3934/GF.2025003

    Related Papers:

  • This study examined the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of 117 companies across Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Qatar from 2021 to 2022 (totaling 234 observations) from the institutional theory perspective using a mixed methods approach. The research is structured in two stages: First, we analyzed ESG scores from ESG Refinitiv data to measure ESG performance based on 186 comparable metrics across 10 categories; second, we conducted a directed content analysis of sustainability reports that utilized 27 ESG disclosure indicators from the GCC Exchanges Committee's unified guidance. Integrating quantitative ESG scores with qualitative content analysis enables a deeper understanding of how companies in these Gulf countries respond to institutional pressures within their unique socio-political contexts. Our findings revealed that while ESG performance has generally improved across the three countries, the extent and nature of these improvements vary significantly. The UAE demonstrates the most substantial progress, particularly in environmental performance, driven by robust institutional frameworks and alignment with global sustainability standards. Saudi Arabia shows moderate improvements, reflecting the influence of Vision 2030 and ongoing reforms. In contrast, Qatar lags, especially in governance and social performance, due to weaker regulatory frameworks and slower internalization of sustainability norms. We found that the effectiveness of ESG improvements are closely tied to the strength of institutional frameworks, the intensity of external pressures, and the degree of internalization of sustainability norms in each country. It underscores the role of coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures in driving corporate disclosure practices. It highlights the complexities of sustainability reporting across sectors and national contexts in the GCC region. The research contributes to understanding how institutional pressures shape corporate sustainability practices in the Gulf region, offering valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars interested in the dynamics of ESG and sustainability in emerging markets.



    加载中


    [1] Abdelqader M, Nimer K, Darwish TK (2021) IFRS compliance in GCC countries: Do corporate governance mechanisms make a difference? Int J Discl Gov 18: 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00123-3 doi: 10.1057/s41310-021-00123-3
    [2] Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (n.d.-a) GCC ESG Metrics. Available from: https://www.adx.ae/english/pages/aboutadx/sustainability/unified-gcc-esg.aspx#: ~: text = The%20metrics%20comprise%2029%20standards, data%20privacy%2C%20ethics%20and%20more (Accessed on 15 May, 2024).
    [3] Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (n.d.-b) Sustainability. Available from: https://www.adx.ae/English/Pages/AboutADX/Sustainability/default.aspx (Accessed on 10 May, 2024).
    [4] Abulibdeh A, Al-Awadhi T, Al-Barwani M (2019) Comparative analysis of the driving forces and spatiotemporal patterns of urbanisation in Muscat, Doha, and Dubai. Dev Pract 29: 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2019.1598335 doi: 10.1080/09614524.2019.1598335
    [5] Aguilera RV, Filatotchev I, Gospel H, et al. (2008) An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organ Sci 19: 475–492.
    [6] Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, et al. (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32: 836–863.
    [7] Ahmed AH, Elmaghrabi ME, Dunne T, et al. (2021) Gaining momentum: Towards integrated reporting practices in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Bus Strategy Dev 4: 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.130 doi: 10.1002/bsd2.130
    [8] Alazzani A, Wan-Hussin WN (2013) Global Reporting Initiative's environmental reporting: A study of oil and gas companies. Ecol Indic 32: 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.019 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.019
    [9] Al-Bassam WM, Ntim CG, Opong KK, et al. (2018) Corporate boards and ownership structure as antecedents of corporate governance disclosure in Saudi Arabian publicly listed corporations. Bus Soc 57: 335–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315610611 doi: 10.1177/0007650315610611
    [10] Alhazmi A (2017) Exploring the factors and effects of corporate social responsibility disclosure in Saudi Arabia (in the area of accounting and finance) (Order No. 27767353). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global Closed Collection (2393156873). Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/exploring-factors-effects-corporate-social/docview/2393156873/se-2.
    [11] Allam MAF (2023) Staying Legitimate in a Changing Climate: A Framework for Studying Corporate Climate Change Communication, In: IG Arraiano, B Díaz, M Del Baldo, R Schmidpeter, SO Idowu (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in a Dynamic Global Environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24647-0_4
    [12] Alojail M, Khan SB (2023) Impact of digital transformation toward sustainable development. Sustainability 15: 14697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014697 doi: 10.3390/su152014697
    [13] Al-Qudah AA, Houcine A (2024) Firms' characteristics, corporate governance, and the adoption of sustainability reporting: Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries. J Financ Rep Account 22: 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0066 doi: 10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0066
    [14] Al-Saidi M, Zaidan E, Hammad S (2019) Participation modes and diplomacy of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries towards the global sustainability agenda. Dev Pract 29: 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2019.1597017 doi: 10.1080/09614524.2019.1597017
    [15] Aluchna M, Roszkowska-Menkes M, Khan S (2024) Corporate governance perspective on environmental reporting: Literature review and future research agenda. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 31: 1550–1577. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2643 doi: 10.1002/csr.2643
    [16] Arayssi M, Jizi M (2023) Royal family board directors and the level of ESG disclosures in GCC listed firms. J Account Organ Change 20: 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2022-0123 doi: 10.1108/JAOC-08-2022-0123
    [17] Asif M (2016) Growth and sustainability trends in the buildings sector in the GCC region with particular reference to the KSA and UAE. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55: 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.042 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.042
    [18] Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, et al. (2018) Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs 23: 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667 doi: 10.1177/1744987117741667
    [19] Bejjani M, Anouti Y, Klat A, Batal J (2019) Putting GCC cities in the loop: Sustainable growth in a circular economy. World Government Summit. Available from: https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org/observer/reports/2019/detail/putting-gcc-cities-in-the-loop-sustainable-growth-in-a-circular-economy.
    [20] Bellucci M, Simoni L, Acuti D, et al. (2019) Stakeholder engagement and dialogic accounting: Empirical evidence in sustainability reporting. Account Audit Account J 32: 1467–1499. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2017-3158 doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2017-3158
    [21] Ben-Amar W, Chang M, McIlkenny P (2017) Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. J Bus Ethics 142: 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1 doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1
    [22] Boiral O, Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Brotherton MC (2019) Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: The auditors' perspective. J Bus Ethics 155: 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4 doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4
    [23] Buallay A, Al-Ajmi J (2019) The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. J Appl Account 21: 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2018-0085 doi: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2018-0085
    [24] Callery PJ (2023) The influence of strategic disclosure on corporate climate performance ratings. Bus Soc 62: 950–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221115715 doi: 10.1177/00076503221115715
    [25] Camarate J, Hedra C, Ignaciuk K, et al. (n.d.) Three themes shaping GCC financial services. Available from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/articles/2020/three-themes-shaping-gcc-financial-services.html (Accessed on September 28, 2024).
    [26] Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32: 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684 doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
    [27] Clarke V, Braun V (2017) Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol 12: 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613 doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
    [28] Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, et al. (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Account Organ Soc 33: 303–327.
    [29] Coen D, Herman K, Pegram T (2022) Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate 'talk–walk' hypothesis. Bus Strategy Environ 31: 3040–3059. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3063 doi: 10.1002/bse.3063
    [30] Cormier D, Magnan M, Van Velthoven B (2005) Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? Eur Account Rev14: 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617 doi: 10.1080/0963818042000339617
    [31] Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 5th eds., Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    [32] Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2006) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd eds., Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    [33] de Villiers C, Dimes R, La Torre M, et al. (2024) The International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) past, present, and future: Critical reflections and a research agenda. Pac Account Rev 36: 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2024-0038 doi: 10.1108/PAR-02-2024-0038
    [34] Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strat Manage J 29: 1027–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.701 doi: 10.1002/smj.701
    [35] Deegan C (2002) Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Auditing Accountability J 15: 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852 doi: 10.1108/09513570210435852
    [36] DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 doi: 10.2307/2095101
    [37] Driver T, ElAlfy A (2023) Double materiality: Why does it matter for sustainability reporting? In: O Lehner, T Harrer, H Silovla, O Weber (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Green Finance, 1st eds., Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 41–56.
    [38] Driver T, ElAlfy A, Weber O (2023) The Future of Standardized Sustainability Reporting (CIGI Paper No. 275; CIGI Papers Series) Centre for International Governance Innovation. Available from: https://www.cigionline.org/publications/the-future-of-standardized-sustainability-reporting/.
    [39] Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Adm Sci Q 55: 114–149. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114 doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114
    [40] Eden L, Wagstaff MF (2021) Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality. J Int Bus Stud 4: 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00054-w doi: 10.1057/s42214-020-00054-w
    [41] El Khoury R, Nasrallah N, Alareeni B (2023) The determinants of ESG in the banking sector of MENA region: A trend or necessity? Compet Rev 33: 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2021-0118 doi: 10.1108/CR-09-2021-0118
    [42] ElAlfy A, Weber O (2019) Corporate sustainability reporting: The case of the banking industry (CIGI Paper No. 211; CIGI Paper Series) Centre for International Governance Innovation. Available from: https://www.cigionline.org/publications/corporate-sustainability-reporting-case-banking-industry/.
    [43] Eljayash KM, James K, Kong E (2012) The quantity and quality of environmental disclosure in annual report of national oil and gas companies in Middle East and North Africa. Int J Finance Econ 4: 201–217. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n10p201 doi: 10.5539/ijef.v4n10p201
    [44] Eng N, Troy CLC, Bortree DS (2024) Symbolic and substantive legitimation: Examining corporate commitments to sustainable development goal 12. J Commun Manag 28: 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-06-2022-0075 doi: 10.1108/JCOM-06-2022-0075
    [45] Farooq MB, Zaman R, Sarraj D, et al. (2021) Examining the extent of and drivers for materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 12: 965–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2020-0113 doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2020-0113
    [46] Fifka MS, Drabble M (2012) Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting – A comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. Bus Strategy Environ 21: 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1730 doi: 10.1002/bse.1730
    [47] Garas S, ElMassah S (2018) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: The case of GCC countries. Crit Perspect Int Bus 14: 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-10-2016-0042 doi: 10.1108/cpoib-10-2016-0042
    [48] Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. J Bus Ethics 53: 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34 doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
    [49] GCC Exchanges Committee (2023) ESG disclosure guidance for listed companies. Gulf Cooperation Council. Available from: https://adxservices.adx.ae/WebServices/DataServices/contentDownload.aspx?doc = 2693943 (Accessed on May 10, 2024).
    [50] Gerged AM, Al-Haddad LM, Al-Hajri MO (2020) Is earnings management associated with corporate environmental disclosure?: Evidence from Kuwaiti listed firms. Account Res J 33: 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-05-2018-0082 doi: 10.1108/ARJ-05-2018-0082
    [51] Gerged AM, Beddewela ES, Cowton CJ (2023) Does the quality of country-level governance have an impact on corporate environmental disclosure? Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Int J Finance Econ 28: 1179–1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2469 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2469
    [52] Gerged AM, Cowton CJ, Beddewela ES (2018) Towards Sustainable Development in the Arab Middle East and North Africa region: A longitudinal analysis of environmental disclosure in corporate annual reports. Bus Strategy Environ 27: 572–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2021 doi: 10.1002/bse.2021
    [53] Gibson CB (2017) Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organ Res Methods 20: 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639133 doi: 10.1177/1094428116639133
    [54] Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad Manag J 45: 58–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285 doi: 10.2307/3069285
    [55] Hahn R, Kühnen M (2013) Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. J Clean Prod 59: 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
    [56] Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15: 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
    [57] IEA (2022) Global Energy and Climate Model: Documentation. IEA. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-and-climate-model (Accessed on October 1, 2024).
    [58] International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (2022a) IFRS S1 general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related finanical information [Exposure Draft]. Available from: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/general-sustainability-related-disclosures/exposure-draft-ifrs-s1-general-requirements-for-disclosure-of-sustainability-related-financial-information.pdf.
    [59] International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (2022b) IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures [Exposure Draft]. Available from: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/climate-related-disclosures/issb-exposure-draft-2022-2-climate-related-disclosures.pdf.
    [60] International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (2022c) International Sustainability Standards Board. Available from: https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-sustainability-standards-board/ (Accessed on June 2, 2024).
    [61] International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (2022d) Statement of Intent to Work Together Towards Comprehensive Corporate Reporting. Available from: https://www.integratedreporting.org/resource/statement-of-intent-to-work-together-towards-comprehensive-corporate-reporting/ (Accessed on May 3, 2024).
    [62] Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2023) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. J Int Bus Stud 54: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00579-7 doi: 10.1057/s41267-022-00579-7
    [63] Issa A, Alleyne A (2018) Corporate disclosure on anti-corruption practice: A study of social responsible companies in the Gulf Cooperation Council. J Financ Crime 25: 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2017-0045 doi: 10.1108/JFC-05-2017-0045
    [64] Jizi M, Nehme R, Melhem C (2022) Board gender diversity and firms' social engagement in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Equal Divers Incl 41: 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2021-0041 doi: 10.1108/EDI-02-2021-0041
    [65] Kilani A, Al-Qteishat A, Sawalha O (2020) Assessments of Qatar's education reforms under the influence of global education standards. INTED 2020 Proceedings, 9276–9281. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.2559 doi: 10.21125/inted.2020.2559
    [66] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (n.d.) Vision 2030. Available from: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/ (Accessed on June 1, 2024).
    [67] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (n.d.-a) Saudi Green Initiative: Vision 2030. Available from: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/projects/saudi-green-initiative/ (Accessed on June 1, 2024).
    [68] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (n.d.-b) Vision 2030. Available from: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/ (Accessed on June 1, 2024).
    [69] Kolk A (2004) A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 3: 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688 doi: 10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688
    [70] Krivogorsky V (2024) Sustainability reporting with two different voices: The European Union and the International Sustainability Standards Board. J Int Account Audit Tax 56: 100635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100635 doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100635
    [71] Macbeth C, Otubu M (2023) GCC Launches Unified Sustainability Disclosure Metrics. Cleary Gottlieb. Online Article published on February 24, 2024. Available from: https://www.clearygottlieb.com/news-and-insights/publication-listing/gcc-launches-unified-sustainability-disclosure-metrics (Accessed on May 3, 2024).
    [72] Mansy O (2018) Top 5 Arab Stock Markets. Forbes Middle East. Online Article published on February 1, 2018. Available from: https://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/industry/business/top-5-arab-stock-markets (Accessed on May 3, 2024).
    [73] Martínez-Ferrero J, García-Sánchez IM (2017) Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. Int Bus Rev 26: 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
    [74] Matten D, Moon J (2008) "Implicit" and "Explicit" CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33: 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458 doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
    [75] Mazboudi M, Sidani YM, Al Ariss A (2020) Harmonization of firm CSR policies across national contexts: Evidence from Brazil & Sweden. Int Bus Rev 29: 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101711 doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101711
    [76] Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83: 340–363.
    [77] Michael J, Awad AB, Khalaf BA (2023) Exploring environmental, social, and governance and bank performance in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Corp Law Gov Rev 5: 192–200. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i2sip6 doi: 10.22495/clgrv5i2sip6
    [78] Millar J, Slack R (2024) Global investor responses to the International Sustainability Standards Board draft sustainability and climate-change standards: Sites of dissonance or consensus. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 15: 573–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0128 doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0128
    [79] Morgan DL (1993) Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res 3: 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107 doi: 10.1177/104973239300300107
    [80] Muzoriwa K (2023) GCC stock markets are hitting record highs. Here's why. Gulf Business. Online Article published on July 29, 2023. Available from: https://gulfbusiness.com/gcc-stock-markets-are-having-a-field-day/ (Accessed on June 1, 2024).
    [81] Nedopil C, Dordi T, Weber O (2021) The nature of global green finance standards—Evolution, differences, and three models. Sustainability 13: 3723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073723 doi: 10.3390/su13073723
    [82] Nicolò G, Zanellato G, Tiron-Tudor A, et al. (2023) Revealing the corporate contribution to sustainable development goals through integrated reporting: A worldwide perspective. Soc Responsib J 19: 829–857. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2021-0373 doi: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2021-0373
    [83] Noureldin O (2023) Gulf Bourses' Panel Announces Common ESG Metrics For GCC Listed Firms. Forbes Middle East. Online Article published on January 9, 2023. Available from: https://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/industry/economy/gulf-exchanges-create-unified-esg-metrics-for-gcc-listed-firms (Accessed on May 10, 2024).
    [84] Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manag Rev 16: 145–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610 doi: 10.2307/258610
    [85] Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 42: 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
    [86] Pirani SI, Arafat HA (2016) Interplay of food security, agriculture and tourism within GCC countries. Glob Food Secur 9: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.05.002
    [87] PwC (2024) 2024 marks a break through for sustainability in the GCC, PwC report. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/media-centre/2024/2024-marks-a-break-through-for-sustainability-in-the-GCC-PwC-report.html (Accessed on June 13, 2024).
    [88] Qatar Stock Exchange (n.d.-a) ESG Initiative. Available from: https://www.qe.com.qa/esg-del (Accessed on May 10, 2024).
    [89] Qatar Stock Exchange (n.d.-b) Sustainability and ESG. Available from: https://www.qe.com.qa/sustainability-and-esg (Accessed on May 11, 2024).
    [90] Ramadan AH, Nassar M, Sharairi MH, et al. (2023) Sustainability reporting and assurance in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: What is missing? Int J Bus Gov Ethics 17: 355–392.
    [91] Ramady MA (2015) Effective regulatory regimes: A comparative analysis of GCC financial regulators. J Financ Regul Compliance 23: 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-09-2013-0032 doi: 10.1108/JFRC-09-2013-0032
    [92] Saudi Exchange (2021) Saudi Exchange Issues ESG Disclosure Guidelines for Listed Companies. PR Newswire. Online Article published on October 28, 2021. Available from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saudi-exchange-issues-esg-disclosure-guidelines-for-listed-companies-301410935.html (Accessed on April 28, 2024).
    [93] Saudi Exchange (n.d.) ESG Guidelines. Available from: https://www.saudiexchange.sa/wps/portal/saudiexchange/listing/issuer-guides/esg-guidelines (Accessed on May 11, 2024).
    [94] Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations, 2nd eds., Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    [95] Scott WR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory Soc 37: 427–442. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40345595
    [96] Simnett R, Vanstraelen A, Chua WF (2009) Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Account Rev 84: 937–967. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784199
    [97] Skjott Linneberg M, Korsgaard S (2019) Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qual Res J 19: 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012 doi: 10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012
    [98] State of Qatar (n.d.) Qatar National Vision 2030. Government Communications Office. Available from: https://www.gco.gov.qa/en/about-qatar/national-vision2030/ (Accessed on May 21, 2024).
    [99] Sustainable Stock Exchanges Initiative (2023) ESG Guidance Database. Available from: https://sseinitiative.org/esg-guidance-database/ (Accessed on May 21, 2024).
    [100] Sustainable Stock Exchanges Initiative (n.d.) Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange. Available from: https://sseinitiative.org/stock-exchange/adx#: ~: text = ADX%20has%20launched%20its%20first, and%20governance%20(ESG)%20impacts (Accessed on May 10, 2024).
    [101] Tsai IT, Mezher T (2020) Rationalizing energy policy reforms in the Gulf Cooperation Council: Implications from an institutional analysis. Energy Policy 142: 111545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111545 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111545
    [102] United Arab Emirates (2024a) Vision 2021. Available from: https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/strategies-plans-and-visions/strategies-plans-and-visions-untill-2021/vision-2021 (Accessed on May 14, 2024).
    [103] United Arab Emirates (2024b) UAE Energy Strategy 2050. Available from: https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/strategies-plans-and-visions/environment-and-energy/uae-energy-strategy-2050 (Accessed on May 21, 2024).
    [104] United Arab Emirates (2024c) National Agenda. Available from: https://uaecabinet.ae/en/national-agenda (Accessed on September 28, 2024).
    [105] Uyar A, Ramadan A, Nimer K (2019) A critical evaluation of sustainability reporting in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Int J Sustain Dev 22: 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2019.105327 doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2019.105327
    [106] Whittingham KL, Earle AG, Leyva-de La Hiz DI, et al. (2023) The impact of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals on corporate sustainability reporting. BRQ Bus Res Q 26: 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444221085585 doi: 10.1177/23409444221085585
    [107] World Bank (2022) Gulf Economic Update: Green growth opportunities in the GCC. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/gcc/publication/gulf-economic-update-october-2022.
    [108] Zaidan E, Al-Saidi M, Hammad SH (2019) Sustainable development in the Arab world–Is the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region fit for the challenge? Dev Pract 29: 670–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2019.1628922 doi: 10.1080/09614524.2019.1628922
    [109] Zakaria S (2017) CSR to be compulsory for UAE companies. Khaleej Times. Online Article published June 13, 2017. Avaiable from: https://www.khaleejtimes.com/local-business/csr-to-be-compulsory-for-uae-companies (Accessed on April 17, 2024).
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(223) PDF downloads(36) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(9)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog