Search Advanced

AIMS Public Health

2016, Volume 3, Issue 1: 110-115. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.110
Previous Article Next Article
Research article Special Issues

Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England

  • 1.
    Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, England
  • 2.
    UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, United Kingdom
  • Received: 13 October 2015 Accepted: 26 February 2016 Published: 14 March 2016

  • Aim: To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England. Methods: Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews included questions about tobacco sales and profit margins, and interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales. Results: The majority of retailers (89%) reported low overall profit margins on tobacco sales (< 6%). The most common response was a profit margin of 4–6%,with some reporting lower margins for price-marked packs of cigarettes (1–6%) and higher margins for non-price marked or premium brands (7% to over 10%). A few mentioned higher profit margins for e-cigarettes. Despite this, most thought tobacco sales were important (90%), and attributed this reliance to footfall (81%), i.e., customers purchasing tobacco also purchasing other products. 42% of retailers expressed interest in reducing their reliance on tobacco sales. Conclusions: Small retailers report low tobacco profit margins, but high reliance on tobacco sales because of footfall. Retailer interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales warrants further research into opportunities for disinvestment. Additionally, retailers’ belief that they are reliant on tobacco sales because of footfall should be further investigated.

    Citation: Sara C. Hitchman, Robert Calder, Catriona Rooke, Ann McNeill. Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 110-115. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.110

    Related Papers:

  • Aim: To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England. Methods: Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews included questions about tobacco sales and profit margins, and interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales. Results: The majority of retailers (89%) reported low overall profit margins on tobacco sales (< 6%). The most common response was a profit margin of 4–6%,with some reporting lower margins for price-marked packs of cigarettes (1–6%) and higher margins for non-price marked or premium brands (7% to over 10%). A few mentioned higher profit margins for e-cigarettes. Despite this, most thought tobacco sales were important (90%), and attributed this reliance to footfall (81%), i.e., customers purchasing tobacco also purchasing other products. 42% of retailers expressed interest in reducing their reliance on tobacco sales. Conclusions: Small retailers report low tobacco profit margins, but high reliance on tobacco sales because of footfall. Retailer interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales warrants further research into opportunities for disinvestment. Additionally, retailers’ belief that they are reliant on tobacco sales because of footfall should be further investigated.


    加载中
    [1] Branston JR, Gilmore AB. The case for Ofsmoke: the potential for price cap regulation of tobacco to raise £500 million per year in the UK. Tob Control 2013:1–6.
    [2] Gilmore AB, Tavakoly B, Hiscock R, et al. Smoking patterns in Great Britain: the rise of cheap cigarette brands and roll your own (RYO) tobacco. J Public Health (Oxf) 2014:1–11.
    [3] Spanopoulos D, Ratschen E, McNeill A, et al. Retail price and point of sale display of tobacco in the UK: A descriptive study of small retailers. PLoS One 2012;7:1–6.
    [4] Hsu R, Myers AE, Ribisl KM, et al. An observational study of retail availability and in-store marketing of e-cigarettes in London: potential to undermine recent tobacco control gains? BMJ Open 2013;3:e004085.
    [5] Rooke C, Cheeseman H, Dockrell M, et al. Tobacco point-of-sale displays in England: a snapshot survey of current practices. Tob Control 2010;19:279–84.
    [6] Eadie D, Stead M, MacKintosh AM, et al. E-cigarette marketing in UK stores: an observational audit and retailers’ views. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008547.
    [7] Tobacco Programme - Public & International Health Directorate. Consultation on the introduction of regulations for standardised packaging of tobacco products 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/standardised-packaging-of-tobacco-products-draft-regulations (accessed December 14, 2015).
    [8] Imperial Tobacco. The Evidence is Plain: The ineffectiveness of standardised packaging for public health: A response to the Chantler Review on standardised packaging of tobacco products 2014. http://www.imperial-tobacco.com/assets/files/cms/The_Evidence_is_Plain.pdf (accessed December 14, 2015).
    [9] World Health Organization. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 2005.
    [10] Calder R, Hitchman SC, Rooke C, et al. Closing the doors on tobacco promotion: An assessment of small retailer preparations for tobacco point of sale display removal and longer term tobacco disinvestment. 2015.
    [11] Imperial Tobacco. Profit from our experience 2015. http://www.imperial-trade.co.uk/increase-your-profit/ (accessed October 6, 2015).
    [12] Keyser JC. The Costs and Profitability of Tobacco Compared to other Crops in Zimbabwe. 2002.
    [13] NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Shop Healthy NYC ! : Implementation Guide - An innovative approach to changing the food retail environment 2013. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/pan/shop-healthy-implementation-guide.pdf (accessed December 14, 2015).
    [14] Prestige Vaping. Prestige Vaping Advertisement. Conv Store 2014:69.
    [15] Njoy. Njoy Advertisement. Conv Store 2015.
    [16] Gilmore AB, Tavakoly B, Taylor G, et al. Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market. Addiction 2013;108:1317–26.
    [17] Walker G. Still rocking and rolling. Conv Store 2014:41.
    [18] Japan Tobacco International. Added value for Stirling rolling tobacco. Asian Trader 2014:30.
    [19] Dalglish E, McLaughlin D, Dobson A, et al. Cigarette availability and price in low and high socioeconomic areas. Aust N Z J Public Health 2013;37:371–6. 
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Public Health
3.1 4.8

Metrics

Article views(5759) PDF downloads(1272) Cited by(15)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog