VOCs in cleaning products used in age care and social facilities: Identification of hazardous substances

Pierre Bonnet; Jérémie Achille; Laeticia Malingre; Hervé Duret; Olivier Ramalho; Corinne Mandin; Pierre Bonnet; Jérémie Achille; Laeticia Malingre; Hervé Duret; Olivier Ramalho; Corinne Mandin

doi:10.3934/environsci.2018.6.402

AIMS Environmental Science

2018, Volume 5, Issue 6: 402-417. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.6.402

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

VOCs in cleaning products used in age care and social facilities: Identification of hazardous substances

University of Paris-Est, Scientific and Technical Center for Building (CSTB), Health and Comfort Department, French Indoor Air Quality Observatory (OQAI), 84 Avenue Jean Jaures, Champs sur Marne, 77447 Marne la Vallee Cedex 2, France

Received: 30 October 2018 Accepted: 17 December 2018 Published: 25 December 2018

Prior to the nationwide survey on indoor air quality in 100 age care and social facilities across France, which is planned for 2019, a questionnaire was sent by email to the directors of all 18,432 institutions of these types to determine the potential emission sources of indoor pollutants. Among these, cleaning practices and cleaning products were targeted. The questionnaire included items regarding cleaning frequency and periods, cleaning techniques, storage areas, the use of air fresheners and the commercial names of the products used. A total of 2140 questionnaires were collected and processed, and 1109 cleaning products, along with their commercial names, were listed. From them, 341 different products were identified, for which 299 safety data sheets (SDSs) were available and analyzed. A total of 216 different chemical substances were identified in the SDSs. The boiling points were retrieved to classify the substances according to their volatility. Finally, information regarding their hazard classification was collected, and six categories of human health effects were considered. A total of 41 chemical substances were classified, among which 10 are carcinogenic, 6 are mutagenic, 1 has reproductive toxicity, 3 have specific target organ toxicity - repeat exposure, 19 are possible endocrine disruptors, 14 are skin sensitizers, and 2 are respiratory sensitizers. Of these 41 chemicals, 51% (n = 21) are volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Despite the limitations of using SDSs, which do not report the exact compositions of the products, this study shows that a large spectrum of volatile substances may be emitted from cleaning products used in age care and social facilities, which may have a potential impact on the indoor air quality.
- nursing homes,
- retirement homes,
- elderly care facilities,
- indoor air quality,
- volatile organic compound,
- safety data sheet,
- health effect,
- carcinogen,
- endocrine disruptor
Citation: Pierre Bonnet, Jérémie Achille, Laeticia Malingre, Hervé Duret, Olivier Ramalho, Corinne Mandin. VOCs in cleaning products used in age care and social facilities: Identification of hazardous substances[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2018, 5(6): 402-417. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.6.402

Related Papers:

Abstract

Prior to the nationwide survey on indoor air quality in 100 age care and social facilities across France, which is planned for 2019, a questionnaire was sent by email to the directors of all 18,432 institutions of these types to determine the potential emission sources of indoor pollutants. Among these, cleaning practices and cleaning products were targeted. The questionnaire included items regarding cleaning frequency and periods, cleaning techniques, storage areas, the use of air fresheners and the commercial names of the products used. A total of 2140 questionnaires were collected and processed, and 1109 cleaning products, along with their commercial names, were listed. From them, 341 different products were identified, for which 299 safety data sheets (SDSs) were available and analyzed. A total of 216 different chemical substances were identified in the SDSs. The boiling points were retrieved to classify the substances according to their volatility. Finally, information regarding their hazard classification was collected, and six categories of human health effects were considered. A total of 41 chemical substances were classified, among which 10 are carcinogenic, 6 are mutagenic, 1 has reproductive toxicity, 3 have specific target organ toxicity - repeat exposure, 19 are possible endocrine disruptors, 14 are skin sensitizers, and 2 are respiratory sensitizers. Of these 41 chemicals, 51% (n = 21) are volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Despite the limitations of using SDSs, which do not report the exact compositions of the products, this study shows that a large spectrum of volatile substances may be emitted from cleaning products used in age care and social facilities, which may have a potential impact on the indoor air quality.

References

[1]	Wolkoff P, Schneider T, Kildesø J, et al. (1998) Risk in cleaning: chemical and physical exposure. Sci total environ 215: 135–156. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00110-7
[2]	Hwang SH, Roh J, Park WM (2018) Evaluation of PM10, CO2, airborne bacteria, TVOCs, and formaldehyde in facilities for susceptible populations in South Korea. Environ Pollut 242: 700–708. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.013
[3]	Lee K, Choi JH, Lee S, et al. (2018) Indoor levels of volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde from emission sources at elderly care centers in Korea. Plos One 13: e0197495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197495
[4]	Almeida-Silva M, Wolterbeek HT, Almeida SM (2014) Elderly exposure to indoor air pollutants. Atmos Environ 85: 54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.061
[5]	Mendes A, Bonassi S, Aguiar L, et al. (2015) Indoor air quality and thermal comfort in elderly care centers. Urban Climate 14: 486–501. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.07.005
[6]	Walgraeve C, Demeestere K, Dewulf J, et al. (2011) Diffusive sampling of 25 volatile organic compounds in indoor air: Uptake rate determination and application in Flemish homes for the elderly. Atmos Environ 45: 5828–5836. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.007
[7]	Annesi-Maesano I, Norback D, Zielinski J, et al. (2013) Geriatric study in Europe on health effects of air quality in nursing homes (GERIE study) profile: objectives, study protocol and descriptive data. Multidiscip Respir Med 8: 71. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-8-71
[8]	Svanes Ø, Bertelsen RJ, Lygre SHL, et al. (2018) Cleaning at Home and at Work in Relation to Lung Function Decline and Airway Obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197: 1157–1163. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1311OC
[9]	Lee SJ, Nam B, Harrison R, et al. (2014) Acute symptoms associated with chemical exposures and safe work practices among hospital and campus cleaning workers: A pilot study. Am J Ind Med 57: 1216–1226. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22376
[10]	Su FC, Friesen MC, Stefaniak AB, et al. (2018) Exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds among Healthcare Workers: Modeling the Effects of Cleaning Tasks and Product Use. Ann Work Expo Health 62: 852–870. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy055
[11]	Folletti I, Siracusa A, Paolocci G (2017) Update on asthma and cleaning agents. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 17: 90–95. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000349
[12]	Le Moual N, Varraso R, Siroux V, et al. (2012) Domestic use of cleaning sprays and asthma activity in females. Eur Respir J 40: 1381–1389. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00197611
[13]	Zock JP, Plana E, Jarvis D, et al. (2007) The Use of Household Cleaning Sprays and Adult Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176: 735–741. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200612-1793OC
[14]	Gerster FM, Vernez D, Wild PP, et al. (2014) Hazardous substances in frequently used professional cleaning products. Int J Occup Environ Health 20: 46–60. doi: 10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000052
[15]	Saito R, Virji MA, Henneberger PK, et al. (2015) Characterization of cleaning and disinfecting tasks and product use among hospital occupations. Am J Ind Med 58: 101–111. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22393
[16]	Wei W, Boumier J, Wyart G, et al. (2016) Cleaning practices and cleaning products in nurseries and schools: to what extent can they impact indoor air quality? Indoor Air 26: 517–525. doi: 10.1111/ina.12236
[17]	National File of Sanitary and Social Institutions (FINESS). Available from: http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/index.jsp.
[18]	ECHA European Chemicals Agency (2018). Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures amending and repealing Directive 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
[19]	US EPA (2005). Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC (EPA/630/P-03/001F).
[20]	IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer (2018). Agents classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–122. Available from: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php.
[21]	ECHA European Chemicals Agency (2018). Candidate list of substances of very high concern for authorization restricted to article 57(f) – Endocrine disrupting properties– human health. Available from: https://echa.europa.eu/en/candidate-list-table.
[22]	BKH Consulting Engineers (2000). Towards the establishment of a priority list of substances for further evaluation of their role in endocrine disruption – preparation of a candidate list of substances as a basis for priority-setting. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/endocrine/strategy/substances_en.htm.
[23]	RPS BKH Consulting Engineers (2002). Endocrine disrupters: Study on gathering information on 435 substances with insufficient data. EU DG Environment B4-3040/2001/325850/MAR/C2. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/endocrine/strategy/substances_en.htm.
[24]	DHI Water and Environment (2006). Study on enhancing the endocrine disrupter priority list with a focus on low production volume chemicals. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/endocrine/pdf/final_report_2007.pdf.
[25]	IEPA Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (1997). Endocrine Disruptors Strategy – Preliminary list of chemicals associated with endocrine system effects in animals and humans or in vitro. Available from: http://iledi.org/ppa/docs/00/00/00/01/01/82/EndocrineDisruptorsStrategy.pdf.
[26]	US EPA (2009) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program – Final list of initial pesticide active ingredients and pesticide inert ingredients to be screened under the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act. Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0109-0080.
[27]	US EPA (2013) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program – Final second list of chemicals and substances for tier 1 screening. Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0477-0074.
[28]	Chemsec (2018). SIN (Substitute It Now!) List database of 912 hazardous chemicals likely to be banned or restricted in the future. Available from: http://chemsec.org/sin-list/.
[29]	TEDX The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, Inc (2018). TEDX list of potential Endocrine Disruptors. Available from: https://endocrinedisruption.org/interactive-tools/tedx-list-of-potential-endocrine-disruptors/search-the-tedx-list.
[30]	ECHA European Chemicals Agency, Information on chemicals. Available from: https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals.
[31]	HSDB Hazardous Substances Data Bank, TOXNET Toxicology Data Network. Available from: https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search2/f?./temp/~gGvC1p:1.
[32]	Chemspider, Search and share chemistry. Royal society of chemistry. Available from: http://www.chemspider.com/.
[33]	CompTox Dashboard by US EPA. Available from: https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard.
[34]	DIN ISO 16000-6 (2012) Indoor air - determination of volatile organic compounds in indoor and test chamber air by active sampling on Tenax TA sorbent, thermal desorption and gas chromatography using MS or MS-FID.
[35]	Gomes C, Freihaut J, Bahnfleth W (2007) Resuspension of allergen-containing particles under mechanical and aerodynamic disturbances from human walking. Atmos Environ 41: 5257–5270. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.061
[36]	Nazaroff WW, Weschler CJ (2004) Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants. Atmos Environ 38: 2841–2865. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)