Milk packaging innovation: Consumer perception and willingness to pay

Valentina Maria Merlino; Filippo Brun; Alice Versino; Simone Blanc; Valentina Maria Merlino; Filippo Brun; Alice Versino; Simone Blanc

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2020, Volume 5, Issue 2: 307-326. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Milk packaging innovation: Consumer perception and willingness to pay

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Braccini, Grugliasco (TO), Italy

Received: 10 February 2020 Accepted: 16 June 2020 Published: 24 June 2020

Currently the cow milk market is characterised by a decrease in consumption and sales, for both fresh and long-life products. In addition to the negative consumer perception towards milk, linked to, for example, its potential perceived negative effects on human health, at Italian level, this product is overlooked on the market in terms of communication strategies and innovation, increasingly rendering this product an undifferentiated commodity. As product packaging represents a key factor to improve and develop products on the market, the aim of this research is to analyse consumer preferences and attitudes towards different innovative strategies of milk packaging. A consumer sample from North-West Italy was involved in the experiment, to investigate their purchasing habits and preference towards cow’s milk. An ordered logit model was implemented, in order to determine consumer willingness to pay for milk packaging innovation (11 packaging indicators), in addition to establishing the best strategies for product improvement, in recognition of the emerging needs of consumers. We found that consumers express a high level of interest towards the packaging attributes associated with environmental sustainability, especially regarding the choice of packaging materials and their recyclable features (from 3.369 to 3.645 of mean preference score of the 5-points Likert scale). Furthermore, consumers declared a willingness to pay a premium price, up to 20% more, for innovative milk packaging, demonstrating the potential for general applicability in the relevant market.
- consumer preference,
- innovative perspectives,
- milk packaging,
- ordered logistic regression,
- willingness to pay
Citation: Valentina Maria Merlino, Filippo Brun, Alice Versino, Simone Blanc. Milk packaging innovation: Consumer perception and willingness to pay[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(2): 307-326. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307

Related Papers:

Abstract

Currently the cow milk market is characterised by a decrease in consumption and sales, for both fresh and long-life products. In addition to the negative consumer perception towards milk, linked to, for example, its potential perceived negative effects on human health, at Italian level, this product is overlooked on the market in terms of communication strategies and innovation, increasingly rendering this product an undifferentiated commodity. As product packaging represents a key factor to improve and develop products on the market, the aim of this research is to analyse consumer preferences and attitudes towards different innovative strategies of milk packaging. A consumer sample from North-West Italy was involved in the experiment, to investigate their purchasing habits and preference towards cow’s milk. An ordered logit model was implemented, in order to determine consumer willingness to pay for milk packaging innovation (11 packaging indicators), in addition to establishing the best strategies for product improvement, in recognition of the emerging needs of consumers. We found that consumers express a high level of interest towards the packaging attributes associated with environmental sustainability, especially regarding the choice of packaging materials and their recyclable features (from 3.369 to 3.645 of mean preference score of the 5-points Likert scale). Furthermore, consumers declared a willingness to pay a premium price, up to 20% more, for innovative milk packaging, demonstrating the potential for general applicability in the relevant market.

References

[1]	Gelici‐Zeko MM, Lutters D, Klooster R ten, et al. (2013) Studying the influence of packaging design on consumer perceptions (of dairy products) using categorizing and perceptual mapping. Packag Technol Sci 26: 215-228. doi: 10.1002/pts.1977
[2]	Koutsimanis G, Getter K, Behe B, et al. (2012) Influences of packaging attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produce. Appetite 59: 270-280. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.012
[3]	Kuvykaite R, Dovaliene A, Navickiene L (2009) Impact of package elements on consumer's purchase decision. Econ Manag 14: 441-447.
[4]	Sevilla J (2012) When it's what's outside that matters: Recent findings on product and packaging design. ACR North Am Adv 40: 308-312.
[5]	Simmonds G, Spence C (2017) Thinking inside the box: How seeing products on, or through, the packaging influences consumer perceptions and purchase behaviour. Food Qual Prefer 62: 340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.11.010
[6]	Adam MA, Ali K (2014) Impact of visual elements of packaging of packaged milk on consumer buying behaviour. Interdiscip J Contemp Res Bus 5: 118-160.
[7]	Mandler JM, Johnson NS (1976) Some of the thousand words a picture is worth. J Exp Psychol 2: 529-540.
[8]	Paivio A, Csapo K (1973) Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognit Psychol 5: 176-206. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90032-7
[9]	Mueller S, Szolnoki G (2010) The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Qual Prefer 21: 774-783. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.011
[10]	Rodríguez-Rojas A, Arango Ospina A, Rodríguez-Vélez P, et al. (2019) What is the new about food packaging material? A bibliometric review during 1996-2016. Trends Food Sci Technol 85: 252-261.
[11]	Demartini E, Gaviglio A, La Sala P, et al. (2019) Impact of information and food technology neophobia in consumers' acceptance of shelf-life extension in packaged fresh fish fillets. Sustain Prod Consum 17: 116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.006
[12]	Heide M, Olsen SO (2017) Influence of packaging attributes on consumer evaluation of fresh cod. Food Qual Prefer 60: 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.015
[13]	Loose SM, Peschel A, Grebitus C (2013) Quantifying effects of convenience and product packaging on consumer preferences and market share of seafood products: The case of oysters. Food Qual Prefer 28: 492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.004
[14]	McDaniel C, Baker RC (1977) Convenience food packaging and the perception of product quality. J Mark 41: 57. doi: 10.1177/002224297704100406
[15]	Suppakul P, Miltz J, Sonneveld K, et al. (2003) Active packaging technologies with an emphasis on antimicrobial packaging and its applications. J Food Sci 68: 408-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05687.x
[16]	CLAL (2020) Quadro dei paesi dell'Unione Europea. Available from: https://www.clal.it/?section=quadro_europa&country=IT.
[17]	ISMEA (2019) Settore lattiero caseario (scheda di settore). Available from: http://www.ismeamercati.it/lattiero-caseari/latte-derivati-bovini.
[18]	Tetrapak (2019) Tetra Rex® bio-based, la prima confezione completamente rinnovabile. Available from: https://www.tetrapak.com/it/packaging/tetra-rex.
[19]	Meneses M, Pasqualino J, Castells F (2012) Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: The effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data. J Environ Manage 107: 76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.019
[20]	L'evoluzione del packaging e dei marchi (2019) Centrale del latte du Torino. Available from: http://centralelatte.torino.it/azienda/levoluzione-del-packaging-e-dei-marchi/.
[21]	Greene W (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th Edition, Stern School of Business, New York University.
[22]	Dai Y, Zhu B, Ying R (2006) Consumers' choice on food safety: a case study of organic vegetable purchasing behavior in Nanjing. J Nanjing Agric Univ Soc Sci Ed 1: 47-52.
[23]	Khan MdA-A, Shaikh AA, Panda GC, et al. (2019) Inventory system with expiration date: Pricing and replenishment decisions. Comput Ind Eng 132: 232-247. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.002
[24]	Harwood WS, Drake MA (2018) Identification and characterization of fluid milk consumer groups. J Dairy Sci 101: 8860-8874. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14855
[25]	Merlino VM, Borra D, Lazzarino LL, et al. (2019) Does the organic certification influence the purchasing decisions of milk consumers? Quality 20: 382-387.
[26]	Thøgersen J, Pedersen S, Aschemann-Witzel J (2019) The impact of organic certification and country of origin on consumer food choice in developed and emerging economies. Food Qual Prefer 72: 10-30. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.09.003
[27]	Italian law: Decreto ministeriale 9 dicembre 2016. (2017) Indicazione dell'origine in etichetta della materia prima per il latte e i prodotti lattieri caseari, in attuazione del regolamento (UE) n. 1169/2011, relativo alla fornitura di informazioni sugli alimenti ai consumatori. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2017/01/19/17A00291/sg.
[28]	Murphy SC, Martin NH, Barbano DM, et al. (2016) Influence of raw milk quality on processed dairy products: How do raw milk quality test results relate to product quality and yield? J Dairy Sci 99: 10128-10149. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11172
[29]	Haas R, Canavari M, Imami D, et al. (2016) Attitudes and preferences of Kosovar consumer segments toward quality attributes of milk and dairy products. J Int Food Agribus Mark 28: 407-426. doi: 10.1080/08974438.2016.1163311
[30]	Werle COC, Trendel O, Ardito G (2013) Unhealthy food is not tastier for everybody: The "healthy=tasty" French intuition. Food Qual Prefer 28: 116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.07.007
[31]	Adam MA, Ali K (2014) Impact of packaging elements of packaged milk on consumer buying behaviour. Inst Bus Adm Karachi 2014: 94-106.
[32]	Zekiri J, Hasani VV (2015) The role and impact of the packaging effect on consumer buying behaviour. Ecoforum 4: 232-240.
[33]	Zhu C, Lopez RA, Liu X (2019) Consumer responses to front-of-package labeling in the presence of information spillovers. Food Policy 86: 101723. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.006
[34]	Finco A, Bentivoglio D, Bucci G (2017) A label for mountain products? Let's turn it over to producers and retailers. Qual-Access Success 18: 198-205.
[35]	De Graaf S, Van Loo EJ, Bijttebier J, et al. (2016) Determinants of consumer intention to purchase animal-friendly milk. J Dairy Sci 99: 8304-8313. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-10886
[36]	Hanrahan L, McHugh N, Hennessy T, et al. (2018) Factors associated with profitability in pasture-based systems of milk production. J Dairy Sci 101: 5474-5485. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13223
[37]	Macdonald KA, Penno JW, Lancaster JAS, et al. (2008) Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. J Dairy Sci 91: 2151-2163. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0630
[38]	Markova-Nenova N, Wätzold F (2018) Fair to the cow or fair to the farmer? The preferences of conventional milk buyers for ethical attributes of milk. Land Use Policy 79: 223-239.
[39]	Umberger WJ, Boxall PC, Lacy RC (2009) Role of credence and health information in determining US consumers' willingness-to-pay for grass-finished beef. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 53: 603-623. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00466.x
[40]	Tempesta T, Vecchiato D (2013) An analysis of the territorial factors affecting milk purchase in Italy. Food Qual Prefer 27: 35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.06.005
[41]	Trinh G, Corsi A, Lockshin L (2019) How country of origins of food products compete and grow. J Retail Consum Serv 49: 231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.027
[42]	Skallerud K, Wien AH (2019) Preference for local food as a matter of helping behaviour: Insights from Norway. J Rural Stud 67: 79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.020
[43]	Schifani G, Romeo P, Dara Guccione G, et al. (2016) Conventions of quality in consumer preference toward local honey in Southern Italy. Qual-Access Success 17: 92-97.
[44]	Hao Y, Liu H, Chen H, et al. (2019) What affect consumers' willingness to pay for green packaging? Evidence from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 141: 21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.001
[45]	Merlino VM, Borra D, Girgenti V, et al. (2018) Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes. Meat Sci 143: 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.023
[46]	Bakke AJ, Shehan CV, Hayes JE (2016) Type of milk typically consumed, and stated preference, but not health consciousness affect revealed preferences for fat in milk. Food Qual Prefer 49: 92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.12.001
[47]	Brewer JL, Blake AJ, Rankin SA, et al. (1999) Theory of reasoned action predicts milk consumption in women. J Am Diet Assoc 99: 39-44. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00012-7
[48]	Briefel RR, Johnson CL (2004) Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr 24: 401-431. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.073349
[49]	McCarthy KS, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA (2017) Milk fat threshold determination and the effect of milk fat content on consumer preference for fluid milk. J Dairy Sci 100: 1702-1711. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11417
[50]	Gilaninia S, Ganjinia H, Charmchi K (2013) Affecting factors of packaging milk production on Guilan consumer behavior. Niger Chapter Arab J Bus Manag Rev 1: 29-40.
[51]	Meneses M, Pasqualino J, Castells F (2012) Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: The effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data. J Environ Manage 107: 76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.019
[52]	Chalupa-Krebzdak S, Long CJ, Bohrer BM (2018) Nutrient density and nutritional value of milk and plant-based milk alternatives. Int Dairy J 87: 84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.07.018
[53]	Lloyd MA, Zou J, Ogden LV, et al. (2004) Sensory and nutritional quality of nonfat dry milk in long-term residential storage. J Food Sci 69: S326-S331. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2004.tb18025.x
[54]	García-Madariaga J, Blasco López MF, Burgos IM, et al. (2019) Do isolated packaging variables influence consumers' attention and preferences? Physiol Behav 200: 96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.030
[55]	Spence C, Velasco C (2018) On the multiple effects of packaging colour on consumer behaviour and product experience in the 'food and beverage' and 'home and personal care' categories. Food Qual Prefer 68: 226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.008
[56]	Ares G, Deliza R (2010) Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Qual Prefer 21: 930-937. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.006
[57]	Balzarotti S, Maviglia B, Biassoni F, et al. (2015) Glass vs. plastic: Affective judgments of food packages after visual and haptic exploration. Procedia Manuf 3: 2251-2258.
[58]	Magnier L, Schoormans J (2015) Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. J Environ Psychol 44: 53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005
[59]	Rebollar R, Gil I, Lidón I, et al. (2017) How material, visual and verbal cues on packaging influence consumer expectations and willingness to buy: The case of crisps (potato chips) in Spain. Food Res Int 99: 239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.024
[60]	Klaiman K, Ortega DL, Garnache C (2016) Consumer preferences and demand for packaging material and recyclability. Resour Conserv Recycl 115: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.021
[61]	Rokka J, Uusitalo L (2008) Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices-Do consumers care? Int J Consum Stud 32: 516-525. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00710.x
[62]	Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C, et al. (2018) Bi-objective design of fresh food supply chain networks with reusable and disposable packaging containers. J Clean Prod 184: 375-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.231
[63]	Sonneveld K (2000) What drives (food) packaging innovation? Packag Technol Sci 13: 29-35. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(200001/02)13:1<29::AID-PTS489>3.0.CO;2-R
[64]	Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro‐Forleo G (2001) Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J Consum Mark 18: 03-520.
[65]	Trivedi RH, Patel JD, Acharya N (2018) Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude, intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing. J Clean Prod 196: 11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.024
[66]	Castellini A, Disegna M, Mauracher C, et al. (2014) Consumers' willingness to pay for quality and safety in clams. J Int Food Agribus Mark 26: 189-208. doi: 10.1080/08974438.2014.897668
[67]	Blanc S, Massaglia S, Borra D, et al. (2020) Animal welfare and gender: a nexus in awareness and preference when choosing fresh beef meat? Ital J Anim Sci 19: 410-420. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1747952
[68]	Simmonds G, Woods AT, Spence C (2018) 'Show me the goods': Assessing the effectiveness of transparent packaging vs. product imagery on product evaluation. Food Qual Prefer 63: 18-27.
[69]	Simmonds G, Woods AT, Spence C (2019) 'Shaping perceptions': Exploring how the shape of transparent windows in packaging designs affects product evaluation. Food Qual Prefer 75: 15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.003
[70]	Junaid AB, Nasreen R (2012) Determination of consumer behaviour amongst millennials in dermaceuticals (skin care products). Int J Mark Stud 4: 88-99.
[71]	Smith BT, Tasman WS (2005) Retinopathy of prematurity: late complications in the baby boomer generation (1946-1964). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 103: 225.
[72]	D'Amico M, Di Vita G, Monaco L (2016) Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. J Clean Prod 120: 64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014
[73]	Testa R, Asciuto A, Schifani G, et al. (2019) Quality determinants and effect of therapeutic properties in honey consumption: An exploratory study on Italian consumers. Agriculture 9: 174. doi: 10.3390/agriculture9080174
[74]	Boin E, Nunes J (2018) Mushroom consumption behavior and influencing factors in a sample of the portuguese population. J Int Food Agribus Mark 30: 35-48. doi: 10.1080/08974438.2017.1382420
[75]	Greene WH, Hensher DA (2008) Modeling ordered choices: A primer and recent developments. Cambrige University Press, 181.
[76]	McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, Frontiers of Econometrics. New York, Academic Press, 105-142.
[77]	Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics using stata. Stata press College Station, TX.
[78]	Massaglia S, Merlino VM, Borra D, et al. (2019) Consumer attitudes and preference exploration towards fresh-cut salads using best-Worst scaling and latent class analysis. Foods 8: 568. doi: 10.3390/foods8110568
[79]	ISMEA Latte e derivati bovini-News e analisi-Riprende a correre l'export di formaggi e latticini. Available from: http://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/9848.
[80]	AlKanhal HA, Al-Othman AA, Hewedi FM (2001) Changes in protein nutritional quality in fresh and recombined ultra high temperature treated milk during storage. Int J Food Sci Nutr 52: 509-514. doi: 10.1080/09637480020027000-6-2
[81]	Antonelli ML, Curini R, Scricciolo D, et al. (2002) Determination of free fatty acids and lipase activity in milk: Quality and storage markers. Talanta 58: 561-568. doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00324-7
[82]	Van Aardt M, Duncan SE, Marcy JE, et al. (2005) Aroma analysis of light-exposed milk stored with and without natural and synthetic antioxidants. J Dairy Sci 88: 881-890. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72754-5
[83]	Ricci EC, Stranieri S, Casetta C, et al. (2019) Consumer preferences for made in Italy food products: The role of ethnocentrism and product knowledge. AIMS Agric Food 4: 88-110. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.88
[84]	Altamore L, Ingrassia M, Chironi S, et al (2018) Pasta experience: Eating with the five senses-A pilot study. AIMS Agric Food 3: 493-520. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.493
[85]	Zhang Y, Jin S, Zhang YY, et al. (2018) How country-of-origin influence Chinese consumers evaluation for imported milk? Available from: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277193.
[86]	Regione Piemonte (2019) Campagna informativa 'Piemunto'. Available from: https://www.regione.piemonte.it/web/temi/agricoltura/promozione-qualita/modulistica-campagna-informativa-marchio-piemunto. Accessed 26 Nov 2019
[87]	Scuderi A, Bellia C, Foti VT, et al. (2019) Evaluation of consumers' purchasing process for organic food products. AIMS Agric Food 4: 251-265. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.251
[88]	Świda J, Halagarda M, Popek S (2018) Perceptions of older consumers regarding food packaging as a prerequisite for its improvement: A case study of Polish market. Int J Consum Stud 42: 358-366. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12427
[89]	Tucker CA, Farrelly T (2016) Household food waste: The implications of consumer choice in food from purchase to disposal. Local Environ 21: 682-706. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2015.1015972
[90]	Drichoutis AC, Lazaridis P, Nayga RM (2005) Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels. Eur Rev Agric Econ 32: 93-118.
[91]	Michaelidou AM (2008) Factors influencing nutritional and health profile of milk and milk products. Small Rumin Res 79: 42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.07.007
[92]	Güney Oİ (2019) Consumer attitudes towards goat milk and goat milk products: A pilot survey in South-east of Turkey. Turk J Agric-Food Sci Technol 7: 314-319.
[93]	Paterson ME (2016) Assessment of consumers' perceptions, preferences, behaviors and values with fluid milk packaging, code date and new product concepts. Doctor of Philosophy, Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 97.
[94]	Rybanska J, Nagyova L, Horska E (2019) Milk product packaging features as the key factor of successful canvassing techniques. Econ Sci Rural Dev Conf Proc 51: 338-345. doi: 10.22616/ESRD.2019.094
[95]	Eltayeb TK, Zailani S, Ramayah T (2011) Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resour Conserv Recycl 55: 495-506. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.003

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)